E-ISSN 2367-699X | ISSN 2367-7414
 
2023, Vol: 9, Issue: 5
9 / 5Current Issue Online FirstArchiveAims and ScopeAbstracting & IndexingMost Accessed ArticlesMost Downloaded ArticlesMost Cited Articles
Required files to be uploaded

Copyright Transfer Form

Original Research

Online Publishing Date:
14 / 10 / 2015

 


BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov.


Abstract
Traditionally, mammographic density (MD) of the breast has been assessed by a radiologist visually. This subjective evaluation requires significant experience to distinguish the relative proportions of the fibrous connective tissue and adipose tissue in the mammary gland correctly.
The aim of this study is to compare the capabilities of the different methods (visual and computer-assisted) for assessing mammographic density.
Our sample in this study consists of 66 patients with digital mammography. The mammographic density has been evaluated using the four-grade scale of the American College of Radiology (ACR); visually, visually using an analog scale and semi-automated using UTHSCSA Image Tool 3.0, Image J and Adobe Photoshop CS6 software.
The average mammographic density calculated using the different methods is as follows: 34.8% (from 10% to 70%); 32.1% (from 10% to 60%); 23% (from 0% to 70.9%); 22.7% (from 2.5% to 78.1%) and 22.5% (from 1.5% to 72.4%).
There is a strong correlation between the results obtained visually and those calculated using a computer-assisted measurement (p< 0.0001). A strong correlation was found also between the results acquired using the different semi-automated programs (p< 0.0001).
Precise measurement of mammographic density is of great importance for the mammographic screening and evaluation of breast cancer risk. The semi-automated methods, used for this purpose are objective, accessible and reproducible tools and have some advantages over the subjective visual assessment.

Key words: imagej breast density, early signs of breast cancer, breast density photoshop, breast density measurement, breast density classification


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by George Baitchev
Articles by Ivan Ivanov
Articles by Ivan Inkov
Articles by Emilia Zlateva
Articles by Zdravko Kamenov
Articles by George Dimitrov
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov. BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE. Int J Surg Med. 2015; 1(2): 48-52. doi:10.5455/ijsm.20150903063859

Web Style

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov. BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE. https://www.ejos.org/?mno=198663 [Access: February 21, 2024]. doi:10.5455/ijsm.20150903063859

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov. BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE. Int J Surg Med. 2015; 1(2): 48-52. doi:10.5455/ijsm.20150903063859


Vancouver/ICMJE Style

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov. BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE. Int J Surg Med. (2015), [cited February 21, 2024]; 1(2): 48-52. doi:10.5455/ijsm.20150903063859


Harvard Style

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov (2015) BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE. Int J Surg Med, 1 (2), 48-52. doi:10.5455/ijsm.20150903063859


Turabian Style

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov. 2015. BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE. International Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 1 (2), 48-52. doi:10.5455/ijsm.20150903063859


Chicago Style

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov. "BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE." International Journal of Surgery and Medicine 1 (2015), 48-52. doi:10.5455/ijsm.20150903063859


MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov. "BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE." International Journal of Surgery and Medicine 1.2 (2015), 48-52. Print. doi:10.5455/ijsm.20150903063859


APA (American Psychological Association) Style

George Baitchev, Ivan Ivanov, Ivan Inkov, Emilia Zlateva, Zdravko Kamenov, George Dimitrov (2015) BREAST DENSITY EVALUATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSESSMENT BY A RADIOLOGIST AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE. International Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 1 (2), 48-52. doi:10.5455/ijsm.20150903063859


Author LoginReviewer LoginAbout PublisherEditorial PoliciesEditorial Review PolicyPeer Review PolicyEditorial & Peer Review ProcessAuthor's Rights and ObligationsPublication Ethics and Publication Malpractice StatementConflict of Interest PolicyPlagiarism PolicyProtection of Research Participants (Statement On Human And Animal Rights)Privacy PolicyCorrections, Retractions & Expressions of ConcernSelf-Archiving PoliciesStatement of Informed ConsentAdvertising PolicyTerms of UseLicense InformationCopyright Information

About International Journal of Surgery and Medicine

International Journal of Surgery and Medicine E-ISSN: 2367-699X | P-ISSN: 2367-7414 International Journal of Surgery and Medicine (IJSM) is an inter ... Read more.



For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome.

Contact Information


 

Any correspondence, queries or additional requests for information on the manuscript submission process should be sent to the International Journal of Surgery and Medicine editorial office as follows:

Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons (BAYS)

inkov@journalmedica.com

Financial department is managed by International Sci Ink Press. 

It is a company registered in Bulgaria with registered no. 205414288 and registered address at 57 Antim I str., Vazrazhdane, Sofia, 1303, Bulgaria.

Tel: +359883427500